Post Chronology

September 2016
M T W T F S S
« Aug    
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  

Categories

Speaking Engagements

UPCOMING
Predict and Prepare sponsored by Workday 12/16

PAST BUT AVAILABLE FOR REPLAY
The Bill Kutik Radio Show® #171, 2/15
The Bill Kutik Radio Show® #160, 8/14
The Bill Kutik Radio Show® #145, 1/14
Workday Predict and Prepare Webinar, 12/10/2013
The Bill Kutik Radio Show® #134, 8/13
CXOTalk: Naomi Bloom, Nenshad Bardoliwalla, and Michael Krigsman, 3/15/2013
Drive Thru HR, 12/17/12
The Bill Kutik Radio Show® #110, 8/12
Webinar Sponsored by Workday: "Follow the Yellow Brick Road to Business Value," 5/3/12 Audio/Whitepaper
Webinar Sponsored by Workday: "Predict and Prepare," 12/7/11
HR Happy Hour - Episode 118 - 'Work and the Future of Work', 9/23/11
The Bill Kutik Radio Show® #87, 9/11
Keynote, Connections Ultimate Partner Forum, 3/9-12/11
"Convergence in Bloom" Webcast and accompanying white paper, sponsored by ADP, 9/21/10
The Bill Kutik Radio Show® #63, 9/10
Keynote for Workforce Management's first ever virtual HR technology conference, 6/8/10
Knowledge Infusion Webinar, 6/3/10
Webinar Sponsored by Workday: "Predict and Prepare," 12/8/09
Webinar Sponsored by Workday: "Preparing to Lead the Recovery," 11/19/09 Audio/Powerpoint
"Enterprise unplugged: Riffing on failure and performance," a Michael Krigsman podcast 11/9/09
The Bill Kutik Radio Show® #39, 10/09
Workday SOR Webinar, 8/25/09
The Bill Kutik Radio Show® #15, 10/08

PAST BUT NO REPLAY AVAILABLE
Keynote, HR Tech Europe, Amsterdam, 10/25-26/12
Master Panel, HR Technology, Chicago, 10/9/012
Keynote, Workforce Magazine HR Tech Week, 6/6/12
Webcast Sponsored by Workday: "Building a Solid Business Case for HR Technology Change," 5/31/12
Keynote, Saba Global Summit, Miami, 3/19-22/12
Workday Rising, Las Vegas, 10/24-27/11
HR Technology, Las Vegas 10/3-5/11
HR Florida, Orlando 8/29-31/11
Boussias Communications HR Effectiveness Forum, Athens, Greece 6/16-17/11
HR Demo Show, Las Vegas 5/24-26/11
Workday Rising, 10/11/10
HRO Summit, 10/22/09
HR Technology, Keynote and Panel, 10/2/09

Adventures of Bloom & Wallace

a work in progress

Potential HRM Enterprise Software Landscape Disruptions — Microsoft

With the first post in this series, I introduced my concept of potential disruptors and other sources of disruption to the HRM enterprise software landscape.  In that post I used Kronos and a hypothesized expansion of their functional footprint — a huge expansion of their functional footprint — combined with their global distribution capabilities, competent leadership, and humongous installed base, to present one scenario which would shake things up good and proper. 

Doing this type of scenario testing is an important component of both competitive analysis and strategic business planning, so it’s something I do quite often.  But it’s also something that I’ve never written about in this public way, so it’s taking a good bit of time to select the right scenarios and lay them out clearly enough to stimulate an intelligent discussion of their pros, cons and likelihood.

[Full disclosure:  Microsoft hasn’t been a client in many years, but they did inherit a license for my HRM Business Model “Starter Kit” when they acquired Great Plains Software, an early licensee.  Because Microsoft has never had a competitive HRMS or TM product for the enterprise, I not only haven’t followed them as I do the vendors within our own space, and I don’t even have contacts in their analyst/influencer relations organiation with whom to fact check this post.]

For this disruption scenario, I’d like to hypothesize that Microsoft, which has been working hard to deliver a competitive set of enterprise business applications, their Dynamics line, but which has NEVER had anything remotely competitive in HRM enterprise software, decides that it must fill that gap.  I think they could do this by either delivering from their own skunk works (but I’ve seen no public clues to their having any such skunk works in operation) or by buying an integrated, already multi-national if not yet global,  true SaaS HRMS/TM platform with some SaaS InFullBloom capabilities that’s been built (or is currently being built) religiously with Microsoft’s most modern tools.   

With Microsoft’s global channel partner distribution assets, their ability to upsell into their considerable Dynamics installed base, many to most of whom have been making do with other brands of HRMS/TM or without, is considerable.  If they could build or buy the right platform, there’s a whole list of never great HRMS/TM vendors who have specialized in filling the HRMS/TM holes in Microsoft’s offerings who would be deader than they already are.  But such a move would also garner Microsoft a much more competitive position against the lower end offerings from the major ERP and HRMS/TM vendors as well as against a range of offerings from that serial aggregator, Infor.  And if Microsoft came up with something really competitive in HRMS/TM, there could be a number of casualties among quite successful HRMS/TM vendors who have prospered using the Microsoft technology stack without having any competition from Microsoft.

After so many years of doing absolutely nothing notable in the area of HRMS/TM, and with no visible as yet talent movements signalling a change in direction here, I’m not expecting Microsoft to get serious any time soon about the missing HRMS/TM components in their business applications suite.  However, if they ever do get serious about this, and I can’t imagine why they haven’t done so already, I think they could be a real market disruptor simply because of their size and reach.

All of this is pure speculation on my part, but hopefully not entirely loony.  I’ve got quite a list of these scenarios taken from my “wild cards” analysis, so please stay tuned.  And if you have greater visibility into what Microsoft is doing in this area, I’d welcome your comments.

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>